Behavior Migration is H-A-R-D, but Possible

I talked with a Jive Clearspace customer last week about adoption struggles (I get to do this for a living now, and frankly, I’m in my dream job). They have what I think is probably a very typical adoption obstacle. Actually, two very typical obstacles.

The first one was a theme at the Enterprise 2.0 Conference in Boston in June 2008. The CEO loves social software, worker bees are adopting it like crazy, but mid-level managers are having what-the-hell moments, because they weren’t properly introduced to the business benefits of social software. They’re putting a stop to all this “social nonsense” until they get a better handle on it.

My advice: Figure out what gives them ulcers at night. Maybe it’s, “how do I meet my management chain’s objectives?” Then, figure out how to explain how your social software solution will help them achieve those objectives better, faster, smarter. For example, one of our customers tied their Jive Clearspace ROI to making critical business processes more efficient (requires registration). Discussing this with mid-level managers who care about more efficient critical business processes would probably be quite effective.

The second obstacle was that a few of the strategic pilot groups were approaching the new Clearspace experience from an old file-centric SharePoint paradigm. “Is this where we put our files now?” The result was a repeat of old file folder hierarchies, which, of course, doesn’t promote cross-enterprise conversations. Note that at this company, constantly increasing efficiency is critical.

So, we talked about the following good practices:

Show how they’re doing their work now, and point out any inefficiencies. These folks would send an Excel spreadsheet around via email. Each person would then upload their modified version into individual SharePoint folders, then someone would consolidate them all into a single file again. (I know! OMG!)

Show how your social software solution replaces that behavior, while making them more efficient in the process. Folks can co-edit a rich table within a Clearspace page, with complete versioning and rollback capabilities. They can create author comments and general user comments to capture the collaborative conversations about the data, and even create some team projects, tasks, or even a blog to capture status reports or the like. The idea is to do the, “and that’s not all!” pitch, once you’ve neutralized the Old Way Of Doing Things.

Address the Fear of Sharing Too Soon. This is the harder, and most critical part. In most organizations, people don’t “put their stuff out there” until it’s pretty much done. All the conversations and collaboration happens before they share, via emails, IMs, phone calls, and in-person meetings.

Here’s the problem: many folks don’t WANT to share their stuff until it’s pretty much done.

  • “My colleagues and my manager will think I’m a doofus if I put something half-baked out there!”
  • “I don’t want anyone stealing my half-baked idea, fleshing it out and taking credit for it.”

My advice? Implement a slow behavior migration. Give those people a private, secure space or group to share their half-baked stuff so that REAL collaboration can take place. The end result won’t be an individual contribution, of course, so help them understand the meaning of co-ownership. Once they’re comfy co-baking with the people they already trust, encourage them to open those private spaces up to more people, or perhaps make them public to the organization, if appropriate.

Hey Gia.. what were you doing working on a Sunday ?? :)

From Luis Benitez on July 28th, 2008 at 6:25 am

Yeah, I wrote this on Friday, scheduled it to publish today, and realized I hadn’t changed the reference to time. As you see, I have done that now. :)

From Gia Lyons on July 28th, 2008 at 7:30 am

I would change that last problem to many folks CAN’T share stuff till it’s done. That’s an issue where I work - some stuff has to stay under wraps until very close to release for all sorts of reasons.
Nice article - will be forwarding it internally.

From Gina on July 28th, 2008 at 9:17 am

Surely you can’t mean “Forwarding” internally? We have to change our language to help those Middle Managers get the importance and magnitude of the Infomation SHaring Culture change! I just blogged on the subject and provided a link to this seminal blog!

From Adrius42 on July 28th, 2008 at 10:44 am

LOL :)

So, one of my fears before I started sharing, was “losing control”. Control in the sense that if I have the knowledge, I have the power to control my career. At the same time, I was always frustrated because there were so many projects out there that were failing because they weren’t using me, they weren’t using my collateral.

And now you are saying, “Luis, don’t be stupid.. they can’t use your collateral unless you share it!”.. But at that time I was thinking “People should be able to find me, *somehow*”… and that’s where the whole system broke. I had no way to publicize my skills. People had no way to discover me. Then, when I started blogging and dogearing, it finally clicked. It was all making sense. People were able to find me and I was able to find people easily.

Another fear, which may be Latin America specific, is record keeping policies at some companies just like “la chica” says: http://socializeme.blogspot.com/2008/07/lotus-notes-8-on-my-mac-helps-me.html?showComment=1216851480000#c4961831126735219868.

Finally, one fear that I’ve heard a couple of times too.. is the fear of sharing because that may bring you more recognition (i.e. more work!) In my experience, that hasn’t happened to me, but I assume mid-level managers may be afraid of losing the control of their employees if these are distracted by “other things”.

From Luis Benitez on July 28th, 2008 at 4:16 pm

Luis, well said! For me, my approach has been, “hey, I’ve got some stuff, feel free to use it, feel free to ignore it. Up to you.” Good point on the mid-manager’s potential fear that his/her people will “waste time” on the social thing.

From Gia Lyons on July 28th, 2008 at 7:32 pm

Great thoughts here! until you get Mgmt buy-in, “social SW” (e.g LC) will be seen as “optional tools” for employees & therefore not a MUST, there needs to be a major shift in “Mgmt thinking” & I believe it is up to people like us e.g. the “Early Adopters” / firm believers to convince & show them on daily basis the benefit to change our ways of working.. (my two cents.. ;-))

From Fred on July 29th, 2008 at 4:17 am

Thanks for the “comment” Fred! ;) Most of my Jive Clearspace customers don’t have a problem figuring out why to use Clearspace, but I do think that mid-management has a problem with any new tool, because they already have SO MANY “collaboration” tools. They probably think, “didn’t we already solve this problem? I’m going to keep using email only anyway, so let’s not waste our time yet again pretending to find value in another tool.”

From Gia Lyons on July 29th, 2008 at 7:54 am

Thanks! Really interesting. I wish i could spend my time on writing articles…just have no time for it.

From John Davis on August 9th, 2008 at 1:20 am

What say you about all of this?

Trackback URL Comment feed


Recent posts

Subscribe